I wonder if we are examining our transportation problems appropriately. Of course, it is a forgone conclusion that for an efficient transportation system
to be maintained, sufficient spending is required, which would include paying our drivers adequately in order to avoid the present scenario. However, should
that ¡°sufficient spending¡± come from fee hikes? Perhaps, fee adjustments are necessary but in the absence of conclusive statistics in that regard, I
shall refrain from comment. What I am concerned about, however, is whether the powers be are conveniently simplifying matters without really trying to
understand the crux of the situation. Will fee hikes really alleviate the transportation difficulties? It seems to me that fee hikes should be the last resort
as opposed to the solution. SMRT has been in profit for years. Although its profits have declined this year, it still remains financially healthy. Given its still
relatively robust bank account, surely it ought to be able to run its transportation services well without talk of fee hikes yet? Singaporeans are rightly
concerned about the developments in the bus driver situation. Most Singaporeans rely on public transportation services. This is especially so in light of
the soaring car prices in Singapore. Given that the majority of Singaporeans utilise public transport, the quality and affordability of our bus and MRT
services are paramount. For the transportation services to run effectively, its drivers have to be motivated. There are many factors that contribute to
motivation. Pay is but one of them. Aside from pay, the drivers have to feel valued. They have to believe that there is a future for them in the company
for which they work. From what I understand from news reports, the drivers in the centre of this controversy feel neither valued nor looked after.
Their salaries are low and they do not feel any sense of loyalty to the company for which they work because they do not feel as if the company cares
for their welfare. Given that SMRT appears to have unilaterally amended the terms of their contract, I have some sympathy for their angst.
Instead of making this an issue of whether or not bus fares need to be hiked, surely it is time for SMRT to seriously consider its model of business.
As many before me have pointed out, transportation services cannot be overly profit driven. There is after all an intrinsic social value in its
continued efficiency beyond the numbers game. A well-run transportation system also contributes to the economy in unquantifiable ways. It ensures
that people get to work on time. It encourages investment by facilitating convenience. It can also boost tourism. In fact,
To improve our transportation system and make it once again ship shape, the question to ask is not if bus fares should be increased but whether
SMRT¡¯s business model is still relevant in light of the problems that have surfaced. As a start, it will have to focus more on its passengers and
not on its bank account. Next it will have to examine if its spending is as efficient as it can be which would include an in depth look at the salaries
of its top executives. I am all for rewarding employees for a good job done but for a reward to have any meaning, it has to be deserved.
To say that bus fares have to be increased in order for the drivers to be better paid over simplifies the problem(s) and dare I say, appears to be